BrandZap
George Little
Back to Blog Index
Redesigning your website? Explore whether to go agency or in-house — with insights from marketing, product, and leadership on what drives the best ROI and results.
It’s a question that comes up in almost every marketing planning meeting — quietly at first, then with increasing conviction:
“Should we redesign our website internally… or bring in an agency?”
Everyone has an opinion.
Design wants control.
Marketing wants speed.
Product wants consistency.
Leadership wants measurable ROI.
And all of them are right — in their own ways.
Choosing between an agency and in-house approach isn’t just about budget. It’s about focus, velocity, and alignment.
Your website isn’t just a marketing tool anymore — it’s your brand’s central nervous system.
The way you approach redesign determines how cohesive, credible, and scalable that system becomes.
So let’s unpack this from each team’s perspective — and then talk about what actually works best in practice.
From a marketing standpoint, the argument for hiring an agency is simple: speed and bandwidth.
Internal teams are often stretched thin managing campaigns, sales enablement, and ongoing content.
A website redesign isn’t a “side project” — it’s a heavy, multi-phase initiative that demands total focus for weeks or months.
Agencies bring dedicated focus and process. They handle everything from strategy and messaging to UX and development — without draining your internal pipeline.
The downside? Marketing teams can feel a loss of agility. You can’t just “jump in” to tweak things midstream; you need to communicate through briefs and feedback cycles.
That’s where many internal teams hesitate — they fear the distance.
But the truth is, a good agency partnership should reduce distance, not create it.
At BrandZap, for example, we integrate directly with our clients’ marketing workflows — providing flexible, subscription-style design support so internal teams keep moving while we handle the heavy lifting.
For marketing, it’s not about giving up ownership — it’s about accelerating it.
From a product and design perspective, the website redesign debate is about control.
Product teams care deeply about consistency — how the marketing site reflects the actual product experience.
The fonts, colors, and interface patterns need to match; otherwise, you risk dissonance between what you sell and what users see.
In-house teams have the advantage of proximity. They understand the brand and product intimately. They know which features are real, which are coming soon, and which stories matter most.
That makes them uniquely positioned to protect accuracy.
But internal teams often struggle with creative perspective. They’re too close to the work.
Agencies, on the other hand, bring external clarity.
They can see your brand as your audience does — spotting messaging gaps, UX friction, or missed opportunities your team has normalized.
The ideal approach blends both:
Product teams safeguard accuracy and design systems, while the agency drives narrative clarity and user flow.
That’s how you get a website that’s both beautiful and believable.
From an engineering or network security viewpoint, the question is less emotional and more operational.
They’re asking:
“Will this new website create security risks, technical debt, or long-term maintenance overhead?”
When projects go in-house, the answer often depends on resources. Internal devs may have strong technical skills but limited time. They prioritize product sprints over marketing work.
Agencies, especially those using modern platforms like Webflow (as we do at BrandZap), bring velocity without compromise.
They can deliver high-quality, secure, low-maintenance sites quickly — without involving your core product engineers.
For security teams, this is ideal: less custom code, fewer dependencies, and clearer ownership.
And because platforms like Webflow are no-code but enterprise-grade, marketing can make updates safely — without introducing risk or breaking production pipelines.
In other words: you get autonomy without anarchy.
For leadership, the agency vs. in-house decision comes down to two questions:
A website redesign is not a side project — it’s a strategic initiative that touches brand, growth, and perception.
If your internal team already has the expertise and capacity to handle it well, the ROI of staying in-house can be high — especially if you’re maintaining a mature system and just need incremental updates.
But if your website hasn’t been meaningfully revisited in years, or your brand and product positioning have evolved, it’s almost always more efficient to bring in an outside team.
An agency provides specialized leverage — deep experience, cross-industry perspective, and the ability to move fast without disrupting internal focus.
For leadership, that translates into opportunity cost:
What could your internal team be doing with those 8–12 weeks instead?
If the answer is “building the product, improving retention, or scaling acquisition,” then agency partnership stops being an expense — and starts being a multiplier.
The best-performing companies aren’t choosing either/or. They’re choosing both.
In this hybrid model, marketing and product own the strategy and day-to-day control, while an agency like BrandZap handles the redesign, system setup, and ongoing design ops support.
That structure provides:
Your internal team becomes the driver.
Your agency becomes the engine.
You’re not outsourcing responsibility — you’re outsourcing friction.
That’s why many SaaS and B2B teams we work with use BrandZap as an extension of their in-house capabilities:
They keep ownership, we handle acceleration.
The result? A system that feels built from within, but runs with the efficiency and polish of an external partner.
If you’re still unsure which path to take, here’s a reframing question we often ask during strategy sessions:
“What’s the real job of this redesign — maintenance or momentum?”
Because momentum requires perspective.
And perspective is what agencies — the good ones — bring best.
So — agency or in-house?
The honest answer is: it depends on your stage, your goals, and your capacity.
But if your brand, product, and story have evolved faster than your website can keep up, it’s time for outside help.
At BrandZap, we bridge the gap between agency and in-house by working like an embedded team — combining creative direction, Webflow development, and brand strategy with your existing marketing and product efforts.
You keep the control. We bring the clarity, systems, and speed.
Because a website redesign shouldn’t just look better.
It should feel like it finally reflects who you are — and where you’re going next.
Agency or in-house for your website redesign? Learn how marketing, product, and leadership teams weigh control, speed, and ROI to make the right call.
Redesigning your website? Explore whether to go agency or in-house — with insights from marketing, product, and leadership on what drives the best ROI and results.
